Saturday, February 24, 2007

The Holy Land


Saturday, February 24, 2007
The Holy Land
The Holy Land?
The Mandir-Masjid issue, as it is better known, has been the focal point of India’s internal religious flare ups time and again, since we found our place on the world map as a nation, and before.
The Babri Masjid
The Babri Masjid was built in Ayodhya, sometime in the 16th century AD, by the first Mughal emperor, Zahir ud Din Babur. There have been a number of mosques built by Babur, and many other Muslim rulers of the country. Many a times, the construction of these mosques, had a history of razing down structures, which stood in those places before. These structures were often places of worship of people of other faiths, especially the Hindus.
The Babri Masjid is said to have a similar history. One would then wonder, why the sensitivity?
Ram Janma Bhoomi
The Hindu epic Ramayan has in it that, Ram, the reincarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu, was born in Ayodhya, to the then ruler of the kingdom, Dashrath. Ram was also the ruler of Ayodhya thereafter. His status in the Hindu religion is nothing less than that of lord Vishnu himself. Ayodhya thus, is called Ram Janma Bhoomi, or simply Ram’s birthplace.
The issue
The Babri Masjid is said to have been built, by razing down a temple dedicated to Ram, which, as legend has it, stood at the very place where Ram was born.
The hard line Hindus have ever since, protested the construction of the mosque, and have advocated the demolishing of the same, and the rebuilding of another Ram temple there.
The same has been a reason for many inter-communal riots, ever since the building of the mosque, some four hundred years ago.
The Hindu hard liners finally had it their way in 1992. On December 6 1992, these Hindu hard liners, entered the mosque premises in hordes of thousands, and did what Babur’s men did four hundred years ago. They demolished the structure, as the law enforcement and government of the world’s largest democracy watched in a dangerous silence, which would be the reason behind some of the bloodiest days the country would witness in the future.
I personally believe, that such an incident might have been acceptable four hundred years ago. But, it is does put serious question marks on as to whether we, have changed at all since.
This just showed how, we Indians knew the meaning of democracy to such a profound depth, that we could abuse it to its fullest.
It just showed, how we Indians believed so strongly in “freedom of expression”, that the nine letter word democracy, would justify actions, which would put to shame, those of some of the world’s most despotic regimes. The riots and backlashes that followed have only strengthened my opinion on this further.
This incident has left a permanent scar on both communities. It has been a catalyst to the production of the home grown Indian Jihad.
The fire still rages in the form of a question, as to whether there should be a Ram Mandir built on the Ram Janma Bhoomi, or, should there be the restoration of the mosque. The solutions presented till date, have not been unanimously acceptable. The Hindus and Muslims in India are Indians, and share the same psyche. They also share the same trend of not evolving mentally over the past four hundred years at least, as is seen in our unfortunate history.
So the question Gautam asks here is, that what is the guarantee that a religious structure built here, would not be demolished in the future, by our people? Can the government assure the people who build it, that they won’t be mute spectators to another abuse of our freedom of expression by us?
Gautam’s final solution
I have not got a “yes” for an answer to any of the above questions.
In such a case, I believe, my solution would ensure an end to this long drawn dispute over a land, which I would love to consider holy.
No Mandir, no Masjid, build a state-owned Cancer/ AIDS research institute, coupled with a hospital, over this land and return its sanctity.
The effects of such a step, if any, would only heal these wounds.
They would only show, to our generations to come, that it took us four centuries alright, but we learnt….
Gautam Ramaswamy (Viperov)
7:14:01 PM
Posted By Gautam Ramaswamy Comments (3) Politics
Comments
rationalbeing Saturday, February 24, 2007 7:30:05 PM
hindu hard liners including the congress all are responsible,it is true that we are all indian but look at the so called secularist parties who tell about minority and majority,also they are involved in pampering of minorities for their votebank,if you speak anything for hindu u r communal,but if u speak for minority u r secular.we should not allow babri masjid demolition as well as the pseudo secularist mindsets which are also dangerous for country's harmony
viperov Saturday, February 24, 2007 7:39:26 PM
To keep this matter as far from religion and politics is what I am suggesting. That is the only way out. I am not talking about our political parties at all. It is in the country's best interst to keep them ALL out of this....Viperov
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:16:19 PM
Dear Gautam, I find your blog thought-provoking. As I could not paste my comments here, I have written a separate blog "As in Mecca, so in Ayodhya." Please read.

viperov Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:44:17 AM
Dear Mr. venugopal,I have been looking for your blog, with little luck. Could you guide me in the same, as I am new to the whole concept of blogging. I believe, a link should do the job.Thanks a mil,Viperov
K.Venugopal Sunday, February 25, 2007 3:44:16 PM
Blog was posted on Saturday February 24 at 9:27:33 PM
.

Q


Saturday, February 24, 2007
Q
Q for QueenbeeQ for QuattrocchiQ for QuriosityQ for QuotasQ for QorruptionQ for QueuesQ for QuestionsQ for QuitIndia Q for aQuittalsQ for osQars.
9:27:50 PM
Posted By vivek aahuja Comments (1) Entertainment
Comments
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:09:56 PM
What a queue of Qs!

Who can identify


Friday, February 23, 2007
Who can Identify?

10:38:58 PM
Posted By Whoopee Poopee Comments (3) Personals
Comments
jj Friday, February 23, 2007 10:58:56 PM
its mk bannerjee of course
Arvind Saturday, February 24, 2007 2:13:39 AM
Sala budhao se there is no escape.
K.Venugopal Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:10:45 PM
He was about the earliest blogger to display his photograph. Definitely a man with the courage of his convictions.

Ajmal Sunday, February 25, 2007 1:12:36 AM
Mr Venugopal, where is your own courage? Why not post? Or is it so bad, like dog's arse?
perfektm Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:00:29 AM
oh shabashee, ye ta pammi hai
perfektm Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:01:07 AM
Oh sabji, ye tu permilla he
perfektm Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:02:38 AM
Oh.. me she is Pamilla
perfektm Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:08:17 AM
Herr Whoopee, du arschloch was machst du mit Frau Anderessen... Sie ist mein;)
Whopeee Sunday, February 25, 2007 2:42:35 PM
Herr perfektmSie schissen Beutel
Tony Sunday, February 25, 2007 3:11:16 PM
No no no, it is Rosie, Auntie Susie's daughter.
Tony Sunday, February 25, 2007 3:28:38 PM
And old man above looks like Uncle, busy doing nothing in office while Auntie Susie showing me a trick or two.
viperov Sunday, February 25, 2007 4:15:49 PM
It is an easy and a cheap stunt. Speaks volumes about the blogger. It also speaks as lot about the frustration many bloggers show against this gentleman in the photo. I am new to this forum and am not sure what the trigger to this could be, but I am sure there is one.Ok.. Now tho the "Victim"... I would like to bring to Mr. Banerjee's notice that there exists a spell check feature in the blog editor. I guess the frustration could be the pathetic grammer and spellings, used with good intentions...@ Everyone..There is no honour is being part of a mob...
Whopeee Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:10:42 PM
Actually, it is MKB daughter. I have enjoyed.
vajpayee Sunday, February 25, 2007 7:36:57 PM
yeh bahut hogaya whoopeeji. acchi baath nahi hai.
vajpayee Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:06:04 PM
meri baath manlo. sudharjao whoopeeji
Arvind Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:51:45 PM
Abe Viperov, kaun khet ka mooli ho bey? Chal phoot leh, sala char aana ka Mahatma.
MKB Monday, February 26, 2007 9:17:07 PM
Mr Arvind, please note these are melon, not mooli.
perfektm Monday, February 26, 2007 9:29:48 PM
Opla,Whoopee.... bist du Deutscher?kannst du deutsch ?Scheiß verdammt, neh, ist nicht m?ch. oder ?jedemfalls gruß aus z?
K.Venugopal Monday, February 26, 2007 11:52:10 PM
Dear Mr. Ajmal, Actually I have only one photo of mine in my PC, taken by my colleague with mobile phone and transferred to my PC. I tried pasting the photo but it was not accepted, saying the photo is too large in size. However, I have my photo on Rediffmail Blog. I concede my mug’s never swooned the girls.
whoopee Friday, March 2, 2007 3:13:19 AM
perfektmM@ch.oder zu Ihnen auch. Kein bin ich nicht deutsch, aber dieses ist die einfache Sprache, zum zu erlernen.
420 Friday, March 2, 2007 11:07:12 AM
What fantastic gazongas.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Manifestation of Weakness


Friday, February 23, 2007
Manifestation of Weakness
We all live at superficial level. The most ironical is, when we go to others and ask for our weaknesses and strength. Why depend on others? The answers can be found at our own. As we ask others, imperfection increases, how? Since, other also has weaknesses. And hence, what ever he will tell you are based on his scales. But how far we are sure that the scale used by him is perfect? But one thing is still sure that the greatest weakness of the human is the inability to remember the “Almighty”. All other weaknesses are just the manifestation of one ill. It is not me who is saying that, it is the greatest of all “Nanak”. We all have weaknesses that are why we are imprisoned in this body. We are so weak even to accept “The Truth”. Whatever we do is the result of weaknesses in us. Since, once we are strong in one field there is nothing left to do anything in that. Our actions signify, hide and rectify our weaknesses. But if greatest of all do anything it is the weakness in us which we see as their actions. As Vivekananda has said, “Fault you see in others is manifestation of your mind.” If we call someone thief, we see thief in him. But why see a thief in him because we know what thief is. But how we know, because it lives in us and its description, its characteristics resides in us. We hide so much from ourselves that it takes millions birth to know it. Then comes “Self Realization” which is also known as enlightment. We keep on adding layers and do virtually nothing to remove them. That is the reason we are never able to know our weaknesses. Those who are self realized know all about their weaknesses. Strength is to know about that your weaknesses, to cope with them, to face them, to accept them rather then without them. Since, only perfection has no weaknesses. That’s why by not accepting our errors we are just increasing our weaknesses. And when we say, “I am sorry for my “faulty” action”, that is the display of the strength. Faulty is the key word here. Everyone knows where he is wrong. Its only that we are afraid of revealing it even to ourselves. And where fear exists it is lack of strength and hence presence of weakness.
10:32:23 AM
Posted By Tarundeep Singh Comments (1) Uncategorized
Comments
K.Venugopal Friday, February 23, 2007 10:25:50 PM
Dear Tarundeep Singh, I see that you have written a series of essays on various topics. I have yet to read all of them but can see that they are well written and of just the length to retain the attention of a blogger, given our short attention span in blogsphere. I shall read at least one of your essays thoroughly and comment on it in due course. Meanwhile, keep up your good writing.

Is Hinduism a religion?


Friday, February 23, 2007
IS HINDUISM A RELIGION???
HERE IS THE TRUTH ABOUT HINDUISM-THE RELIGION THAT EVEN DOESNOT TREATS HUMANS EQUAL.READ IT PATIENTLY.Hinduism did not exist before 1830. It was created by the English colonialsts in the 1830s. This remarkable circumstance is evidenced by the fact that none of the travellers who visited India before English rule used the word `Hindu' or `Sanatana'. This is amply borne out by the Encyclopedia Britannica, which states :
" The term Hinduism ... [ was ] introduced in about 1830 by British writers. " -- [ EB 20 `Hinduism ' 519 ] In other words, the founding father of `Hinduism' is an Englishman ! Nowhere in the Vedas, Puranas or any other religious text prior to 1830 AD are the terms `Hindu' or `Sanatana Dharma' used. Not a single inscription contains the terms `Hindu' or `Sanatana' prior to the Muslim era. ----------------------------------------------------------------`Hinduism' as a term is such a confused jumble of different religions that there does not even exist a standard concept of God.
SHAMEFUL LIES ABOUT ISLAM"Indeed, the Muslims have on several occasions been declared to be Hindus and the bulk of Indian Muslims have been fallaciously claimed to be `converted Hindus'. Hindus claim that the shrine of the Kaaba at Mecca, revered by the Muslims, was actually a shrine of Saturn, god of the Nabataeans. Yet the Aryan Vaishnavites claim that this Saturn was actually Shiva, and that the Muslims are thus Hindus ! None other than the proto-Nazi Madame Blavatsky set forth this claim:

" Now we have to remember that Siva and the Palestinian Baal or Moluch, and Saturn are identical; that Abraham is held unitl the present day by the Mahometan Arabs as Sasturn in the Kaaba, that Abraham and Israel are names of Saturn, and that the Sanchoniathon tells us that Saturn offered his only-begotten son as a sacrifice to his father Ouranos, and even cirumcised himself and forced all his household and allies to do th esame, to trace unerringly the biblical myth to its source, But this source is neither Phenician, nor Chaldean; it is purely Indian, and the original may be found in the Maha-Bharata." -- [ Isis.I.578 ]

A paper presented at the World Hindu Conference at Columbo in April 1982 claimed that "The Hajrul Aswad (Kaaba, the Black Stone) is only a form of Shivalinga."
So the wars between the Prophet of Islam Mohammed and the Arab pagans were between Hindus and Muslims ! A suitable excuse for the Hindutva fanatics to extend their mythical Hindu-Muslim conflict further back into history ! ?

" Before the rise of Islam, there lived in Arabia many Hindus, mostly Brahmans, who settled there observing Hindu religious customs including the worship of Shiva as Makkesha [ Mahesha ] from which the name of Mecca is said to be derived." -- [ Vision.183 ]

No doubt, the recently acquired Brahmin nuclear bombs may find a pious target in the quest for building a Ram-mandir at Mecca !

One can find this and much more on the `proof' that all races and religions in the world are derived from `Hinduism' in the article [ Against ] . "


Judge for yourself what a lie Hinduism is!
HINDUISM - A JOKE OR A RELIGION?The facts that I present below are not fabrications (like the ones hindus have done). They are well accepted tenets and symbols of hindus. This post is not meant to abuse anyone (since I will only state plain truths accepted by all hindus). Brother Arshad has already highlighted some facts. Since most forum members have never known or met a hindu, they are unaware of the shame that is hinduism.Fact 1:Hindus worship genitals (rub your eyes!) of their gods! Linga is a representation of shiva's phallus.Fact 2:That hindus worship cows is well known. Did you know that they also worship monkeys (hanuman), elephants (ganesh), rats (mount of ganesh), snakes etc.? For all the intellect that human beings were given, hindus decided to make themselves subservient to crawling animals!Fact 3:Urine of cow (go mutra) has therapeutic value according to hindus!Fact 4:Most hindu gods were born out of wedlocks!http://www.raceandhistory.com/worldhotspots/riddlerama.htm clearly states how hindu gods and goddesses were born. The details are too colourful to be reproduced on this forum.Fact 5:hindu gods fought devils and lost on many occasions! No wonder why hindus are losers.
A PRIMER ON LINGAM & YONI
Lingam and Yoni are the male and female sexual organs respectively. Hindus are allowed to worship anything - including sexual organs. It is not unknown for them to name their children Shiva Lingam (God Shiva's sexual organ) or Rama Lingam (God Rama's sexual organ). (In some places in Karnataka, the gods demand both male and females to pray naked together.)
This practice is not so much a survival of pre-Brahmanic Saiva religion, but arose as a means of Brahmins ensuring a constant supply of lower-caste women to satisfy their lecherous needs. The Brahmins, who possessed absolute power over all other races, lived a life of constant debauchery, raping the non-Brahmin women and forcing them into prostitution--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brah(man?) Para, can you comment on the above practice? You needn't comment on Rama Lingam, since you junked Ram some time back. Just get back to me on Shiva Lingam. Your efforts will be highly appreciated!
Hinduism's `Holy' Books
Section V Oh You Hindu Awake ! by Dr. Chatterjee


THE "HOLY" BOOKS (THE VEDAS) AND HINDUISM THE TALES OF RAMAYANA

Should you read the Ramayan you will come to the conclusion that it cannot be a God revealed book. On the other hand you will find materials of pornography, incest, lies, cheating etc.
The average Hindu is kept in the dark and in reality, he is ignorant on matters pertaining to Hindu beliefs. If he really reads the Ramayana, we challenge, he will be ashamed of his religion and himself for being a Hindu.

"THE GITA AS IT WAS"

"THE GITA AS IT WAS" is a shocking book which reveals the Brahmin fabrication and forgery of the Gita. Mr Phulgenda Sinha, a Sanskrit scholar from Bihar, now settled in the U.S., has come out with the original Gita which, he says, the Brahmin have interpolated to obscure its original message. The author also gives the original text in Sanskrit and English to prove his claim. The book is available from: Open Court, La Salle, Illinois -61301, U.S.A. Price US$ 15.95.

UNSCIENTIFIC CLAIMS

Brahmins always have a tendency to claim everything in the name of SCIENCE. But the Scientists, Doctors and Specialists claim otherwise. First of all any man with common sense won't agree to the claims originated by these BRAHMINS. Here are a few examples of Brahmin-originated unscientific claims:

(A) THE EARTH IS FLAT : The NARASINGA PURANA, Page 169 : Abithana Sinthamani, the Vedas and `holy' Puranas claim that the Earth is flat. Today it has been proved beyond doubt by the scientists that the earth is round. Yet the bigoted Brahmins refuse to believe this and have hence set up a `Jambudvipa Institute' in Gujarat which tries to `prove' the Vedic flat Earth theory!

(B) DISTANCE BETWEEN EARTH, SUN & MOON : The VISHNU PURANA says that sun is 800,000 miles and moon is 2,200,000 miles away from the earth respectively. Astronomy has now proved that the moon is nearer to the earth, i.e. 240,000 miles and that the sun is 93,000,000 miles away from the earth.

(C) THE AREA OF THE EARTH : MARKANDEYA PURANA says that the earth has an area of 4,000,000,000 square miles. According to astronomy, it is only 190,700,000 square miles.

(D) VIBOOTHI (COW DUNG ASH) The Vedas say that the cow is holy and should be worshipped. These Brahmins also claim that cow dung ash has medicinal value. Samples sent to a leading test laboratory in West Germany have proved this to be untrue. Even today ignorant Hindus smear their homes with cow dung.

In India people are dying of hunger. Why are these low caste Hindus prohibited from eating beef? In India cow meat is cheaper than other available meats. Instead of these Brahmins taking care of the low caste peoples of India they are doing their best to save their "holy" cows. According to Valmiki's Ramayana, God Rama "ATE" meat. Why then have these Brahmins given up beef-eating?

The answer is that vegetarianism was merely a Brahmin conspiracy to exterminate the lower castes. Since the Brahmins did not have any work to do, they could never die from a vegetarian diet, whilst the labouring races would be afflicted by disease, death and devastation. Realising this, the Brahmins ruthlessly enforced vegetarianism. As a result, several races became extinct, and the Sudras suffer from unbelievable pain.

(E) URINE DRINKING " One erstwhile Prime Minister, Morarji Desai (Brahmin), boasted that he was drinking eight ounces of his own urine daily (pure and fresh!) in the morning in accordance with the Vedas claim that urine has medicinal value. With the same claim today the Brahmins/RSS are drinking cow's urine as if it is a DAILY TONIC.

No scientists have ever claimed that urine has any medicinal value. On the contrary it is well known fact that urine is an unwanted organic substance that the human body needs to discharge.

(F) SUN WORSHIP : The Vedas and Puranas say that all Hindus must pray to the sun god SURYA, and that if you look at the sun daily every morning with your naked eyes, your sight will improve. Accordingly many Hindus practise this act of worship; but instead of their eyesight improving, India is the country that has the most blind people in the world (2.5 million blind people and 9 million with corneal blindness). This is the reason why the Brahmins inculculated the worship of the Sun : The lower-caste men would get blinded, and the Brahmins could thence steal their women and force them to become Devadasis!

There is no scientific truth in sun worship, and on the contrary the scientist and doctors advise everyone not to look at the sun directly with the naked eye. Who is telling us the truth, the Scientists or the Hindu scriptures? You be the judge! The credit of India's blindness also goes to Hinduism and the Brahmins.

(G) THE RIVER GANGES : Hindus are dumping half-cremated bodies, and the ashes of these corpses, into River Ganges for their salvation as ordered by the Hindu scriptures. In other words the Holy Ganges water is a human soup! This has made the Ganges water polluted and a breeding ground for numerous diseases.

Still these Brahmins claim the River Ganges a sacred river - saying that nothing can contaminate it. Why then is the Government of India spending millions of rupees to clean up the dirty waters of River Ganges?

(H) THE THREAT OF THE ECOLOGY : AP News (India) dated 10-1 1-86 says:
When a Hindu is cremated in India, one or more medium-sized trees are also chopped down to accompany him on the funeral pyre. Ecologists warn that forest loss seriously threatens the environment and that we have already lost 32 % of the Indian forest. Daily in India, Hindus are dying and taking with them trees. A staggering 6.43 million kilograms of timber goes up in flames each day. The annual loss is 2.35 million tons. How much pollution does a body create when it is burnt with wood? (Not only that, imagine the foul smell it causes in the atmosphere.)

This is the reason why the Thar desert, once a massive forest, is now a huge desert. The Brahmins destroyed all the environment by enforcing the environmentally destructive cremation laws, which led to the annihilation of all vegetation, the desertification of the Thar forest and the extinction of all human life there. It must be remembered that the current desert regions of Rajasthan - Punjab were once the center of Brahmanic `civilization' : they were thus referred to as Brahmavartta. Indeed, if the Brahmins should obtain absolute domination over the India, this once-flourishing continent shall become a massive Thar desert, devoid of any human life.
This is what Wilkins has to write about Hinduism:

"The most absurd stories of their gods are readily believed... This hurrying from one means of salvation to another can be accounted for partly by the fear that though an act of merit may have satisfied the claims of one deity, others who have not been pacified may wreck their vengeance upon them.
Interested and unscrupulous priests make capital out of the gross ignorance and credulity of the people.... Shrine after shrine is visited and word after word is done; and yet the fear remains that some deity has been neglected who at any moment may demand his rights, or punish for neglect..... There are so many deities, and are so different in character, that almost any habit can be different in, almost any vice committed, under the impression that it is pleasing to one or another."
-- W.J. Wilkins, Modern Hinduism

What more can one say about the `virtuous' and `great' Hinduism?


PART I: HINDUISM UNVEILED1. WHY THE GODS VANISHED:"When gods and men lived together in the world, men kept asking the gods for all that they lacked, saying, 'We don't have this. Let us have it.' The gods began to hate all these demands, and they vanished." -- Satapatha Brahmana 2:3:4:4.2. ORIGIN OF HOLY SHIV LINGA:
Lord Siva seduces the Pine Forest sages' wives and is cursed for this immoral behavior. Origin of the holy Linga which is commonly worshipped in Hindu temples:"When the sages saw Siva naked and excited they beat him and they said, 'Tear out your linga.' The great yogi said to them, 'I will do it, if you hate my linga', and he tore it out and vanished." -- Kurma Purana 2:38:39-41; cf. Haracaritacintamani 10:74; Yagisvaramahatmya 26a. 14.In another version, the sages in the forest quote the legal texts regarding the penalty for seducing a guru's wife when they punish Siva:"You false ascetic, let your (Siva's) linga fall to earth here. A shameless and evil man who has seduced another man's wife should be castrated; there is no other punishment ever. A man who has seduced his guru's wife should cut off the linga and testicles himself and hold them in his hands and walk until he dies." -- Siva Purana, Dharmasamhita 10:187-90; cf. B. K. Sarkar, pp.234-5.3. MORE ON ORIGIN OF HOLY SHIV LINGA
Here is another origin of the holy Linga:"... He (Siva) agreed to this and laughed, for he was secretly amused, and he said to Brahma, 'There is no good use for this linga except for the creation of progeny.' And as he said this he broke it off and threw it upon the surface of the earth. The linga broke through the earth down to the subterranean hell and went to the very sky. Vishnu sought the end of it below, and Brahma flew upwards, but they did not find the end of it, for all their vital effort. Then a voice arose out of the sky as the two of them sat there, and it said, 'If the linga of the god with braided hair is worshipped, it will certainly grant all desires that are longed for in the heart.' When Brahma and Vishnu heard this, they and all the divinities worshipped the linga with devotion, with their hearts set upon Rudra (Siva)." -- Siva Purana, Dharmasamhita 49:23b-46, 74-86.

If Brah* ?ling?ers anymore on this forum, all his gods will lose their ?linga? one by one.
HINDUISM TUTORIAL - II

Dear All, our guest lecturer Brah(man?)ji Paraji has graciously rejoined the thread. As promised, the tutorials will now restart.



HOW LORD HANUMAN (THE MONKEY-GOD) WAS BORN"One day Shiva saw the Mohini form of Vishnu. He was struck by Kama's arrows and let fall his seed. The Seven Sages put the seed in a pot and they infused it into the daughter of Gautama through her ear. In time, Hanuman, the monkey-god, was born from it." -- Shiva Purana 3:20:3-7.

HINDU GODS ARE PUNISHED FOR RAPE
Lord Brahma, Vishnu & Shiva rape Anasuya and are cursed. This is also an origin of the holy Shiv linga as Shiva is cursed to be worshipped as the linga (phallus):"One day the sage Atri was performing tapas with his wife Anasuya. Brahma, Visnu, and Shiva came and offered him a boon, but Atri remained silent, meditating. Then the three gods went to Anasuya. Shiva had his linga in his hand, Vishnu was full of erotic feeling, and Brahma was beside himself with desire, saying to Anasuya, 'Make love with me or I will die.' When she heard this coarse speech, Anasuya made no reply, for, although she feared the anger of the gods, she was true to her husband. But they were overcome with delusion, and they raped her by force. Then she became angry and she cursed Shiva to be worshipped as a linga, Brahma to be worshipped in the form of a head, and Vishnu to be worshipped as feet, in order to ridicule them all, and she cursed them all to be reborn as her sons. Because of this, Shiva was reborn as Durvasas." -- Bhavisya Purana 3:4:17:67-78.
HINDUISM'S VIEW OF WORLD'S CREATION (VEDAS & UPANISADS)"In the beginning this world was simply what is non-existing; and what is existing was that. It then developed and formed into an egg. It lay there for a full year and then it hatched, splitting in two, one half becoming silver and the other half gold. The silver half is this earth, while the golden half is the sky. The outer membrane is the mountains, the inner membrane, the clouds and the mist; the veins, the rivers; and the amniotic fluid, the ocean. Now, the hatchling that was born was the sun up there." -- Chandogya Upanisad 3:19:1-4.


That?s all for now. If you have any questions (I'm sure you have many!), our guest lecturer Brah(man?)ji will be happy to answer them. I hope you enjoyed the tutorial.

STATUTORY WARNING: Our guest Brah(man?) has propensity to use very colorful language just like that in hindu scriptures.
LORD SHIVA GETS THE OTHER HINDU GODS PREGNANT:"The gods came to Shiva and said, 'We have all become pregnant and are lactating. Your seed is burning our bodies and we are a laughing-stock, for we are men who have become pregnant. Help us.' Shiva smiled and said, 'But this is what you wanted. You did not want a son born in the belly of Devi, and so you yourselves have become the place of the embryo." -- Saura Purana 62:5-12.Next I discovered how a Brah(man?) like you came into being. LORD BRAHMA LUSTS SIVA'S WIFE & THOUSANDS OF BRAHMANS ARE BORN"Brahma saw the beautiful face (or feet) of Parvati at the wedding, and he became excited and shed his seed upon the ground. In fear of Shiva, he began to make the seed barren, but Shiva said, 'Brahma, you should not kill Brahmins, and these are great sages.' Then 88,000 tapasvins were born from the seed, and they ran around Brahma calling him 'Daddy, daddy!' " -- Brahma Purana 72:18; Vamana Purana 27:56-9; cf. Shiva Purana, Jnanasamhita 18:62-8; Shiva Purana 2:3:49:3-10; Skanda Purana 1:1:26:15-22.1. WHO BEGOT BRAH(MAN?) PARA & HOW?Was it? a) Brahma with Parvati (Shiva's consort) b) Shiva with a Hindu god (don't ask me how that's possible, just read tutorial - III) c) Vishnu with Ansuya (remember the rape) d) Shiva with some unknown sage's wifeAnswers awaited. Early bird gets a prize (no seeds on offer here!).

11:14:48 AM
Posted By Ajmal Rashid Comments (3) Uncategorized
Comments
perfektm Friday, February 23, 2007 11:12:16 AM
Rashids stupidnesssss,Anasuiya converted brahma,vishnu and mahesha into childerns and then feeded them milk... so literally you are blaming childerns for rape...well what can i say, perhaps in islam feeding milk to childerns is rape`?
crazy hindus Friday, February 23, 2007 7:12:07 PM
LOL!These dumbheads are so dirty they PISS AROUND openly in public not even cleaning themselves and they accuse others as stinky people LOL!Actually even ringing of temple bells looks like as if someone is shaking the lawdas!
K.Venugopal Friday, February 23, 2007 9:43:04 PM
Ajmal Rashid may have cut and pasted this blog with the intention to 'pay back' Hindus for all the ‘muck’ being written about Islam and its Prophet. The questioning of Islam, Quran and Mohammad is about the basic surmises of Islam and the claims of Quran being the word of God and Mohammad being an exemplar of mankind. The type of questioning as seen in the cut and paste job by Ajmal is due to the ignorance that Hindus celebrate religion as expressions of divinity in various idioms and therefore even a way-off expression would necessarily have a kernel of truth in it, however coarsely it may be expressed. It is for the perspicacious to find the kernel. In any case, Hinduism is not dependent on its expressions but on the experience of divinity among its practitioners. Islam, on the other hand, is dependent on the image of its ‘official’ expression and any other expression, let alone a coarse one, would send the whole community into hysterics. May I add that Hinduism is able to celebrate expressions of all sorts because Hinduism teaches that the Creator and His Creation are one while Islam is able to celebrate only an official expression because Islam has separated the Creator and the created. The limitation of Islam in celebrating divinity is the cause of its intolerance.

Infidel Friday, February 23, 2007 9:59:09 PM
Does that make islam divine? is that your proof that MO was not a pedophile? Does is make quran the word of god? A BIG NO.Shame on you ajmal, you all are a like. YOu are so badly indoctrinated that you can not even see the facts shown to you and accept the truth sitting in fornt of you. Showing mistakes in HINDUISM or Christianity or Budhism or any other religion, will not make your islam divine. ISLAM is a CULT, MO is a PEDOPHILE, ALLAH is slave god of MO, QURAN is a COMIC BOOK and PEOPLE LIKE YOU are BLIND ZOMBIES (who don't have "EVIL ORGAN" known as BRAIN). That is the truth and the only TRUTH about ISLAM.Refute a single point, if you can. Else, learn your islam first and then come to us, you ignorant one.PS: Wake up ajmal, its never too late to seek the truth. Come out of this evil cult, as you are so young and your indoctrination is just 18 years in total. Don't forget you have to face TRUE GOD,(not the slave god of pedo MO),which will surely ask you:"why didn't you use your brain while you had one" and "being shown the truth so many times you refused to accept it and stuck to teaching of pedo MO, why" and hence go to hellfire for eternity.LOL
Infidel Friday, February 23, 2007 10:17:25 PM
Thanks ajmal, for accepting today that MO was a pedophile. I quote your comment here as:"I AGREE THAT NAOOZU BILLAH HE WAS PAEDOPHIL" ajmal.rashid Friday, February 23, 2007 9:46:55 AM You got it right ajmal, now you are very close to the whole truth. Congrats.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

How millions of Muslims kiss Shivling everyday!


Wednesday, February 21, 2007
How Millions of Muslims KISS SHIVLING EVERYDAY....!!
I found this article on a discussion board on the Internet:
Vedic Past Of Pre-Islamic Arabia & about Vishnu's Bona vaman Avtar how it connected to Mecca
By a Vedic Researcher Pt. Badmashcharya
Many centuries before prophet Muhammad and the advent of Islam, Arabia or Arabistan was an extremely rich and glorious center of Vedic civilization. Arabia was in fact a flourishing civilization which revered Vedic culture. In fact the Black Stone at the Kaaba (mecca?) is the Lingam of Lord Shiva. Millions of Muslims kiss this sacred emblem of Lord Shiva every day,
The Kaba temple which was misappropriated and captured by Muslims was originally an International Vedic Shrine. The ancient Vedic scripture Harihareswar Mahatmya mentions that Lord Vishnu's footprints are consecrated in Mecca. An important clue to this fact is that Muslims call this holy precint Haram which is a deviation of the Sanskrit term Hariyam, i.e. the precint of Lord Hari alias Lord Vishnu. The relevant stanza reads:
"Ekam Padam Gayayantu MAKKAYAANTU Dwitiyakam Tritiyam Sthapitam Divyam Muktyai Shuklasya Sannidhau"The allusion is to the Vamana incarnation of Lord Vishnu whose blessed feet were consecrated at three holy sites, namely Gaya, Mecca and Shukla Teertha. Worshipping such carved, holy foot impressions is a holy Vedic custom which convert Muslims are inadvertently perpetuating. But in doing this they delude themselves and mislead others that these foot-impressions which are on reverential display in several mosques and tombs around the world are in fact Muhammad's own. There are several snags in this argument. Firstly worshipping a foot -impression amounts to idolatry and should therefore be taboo for a true Muslim. Secondly Muhhamad disclaimed having performed any miracles. Therefore there can be no foot-impression of his on stone. Thirdly foot-impressions must always be in pairs like shoes. Yet in most of these shrines, it is usually a single footprint which suggests that Muhammad walked on only one foot. Another question that crops up is whether the foot-impression is of the same size and foot in all the shrines. The fact appears to be that when the Vedic Kaba shrine in Mecca was invaded by Muhammad, the pairs of foot impressions of Vedic deities there were plundered and later traded to the gullible and devout as Muhammad's own footprints for some favour, reward or personal gain by unscrupulous clergy. That is why they are single and not in pairs.
The Black Stone which is the Shiv Emblem (also known as Sange Aswad which is a corrupted form of the Sanskrit word Sanghey Ashweta--meaning non-white stone) still survives in the Kaba as the central object of Islamic veneration.
The Shiv Ling at The Kaba. It was broken in seven places and now is held together by a silver band.The term Kaba itself is a corruption of the Sanskrit word Gabha (Garbha + Graha) which means Sanctum.
In addition, in the inscriptions from Hajja and its neighborhood was found a votive vessel dedicated by members of two tribes called Rama and Somia. Rama and Soma are Vedic deities, Rama is of the Solar dynasty and Soma is of the Lunar Dynasty. The moon god was called by various names in pre-Islamic times, one of them was Allah. Allah had 3 children, Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Manat. Al-Lat and Al-Uzza were both feminine deities. Alla is another name for the Hindu goddess Durga. It is obvious that the goddess Al-Lat was Alla (Durga) and Al-Uzza was Oorja (energy or life force also known as Shakti). Manat was none other than Somnath which is another name for Lord Shiva. One significant point to note that Soma in Sanskrit means Moon and Nath means Lord. Thus the Kaba itself was dedicated to the Moon God Somnath alias Shiv and the word Somnath was corrupted to Manat. The famous Black Stone is none other than the ShivLing of Makkeshwar alias Mecca. Lord Shiva is always shown with a crescent Moon on his head and every Shiva temple is supposed to have a sacred water spring representing the Ganges. The Crescent Moon pinnacle of the Kaba and the Zamzam spring (actually Zamza from Ganga) are irrefutable testaments to the Vedic origins of the Kaba.
Maqam-E-Ibrahim or more appropriately the pedestal of Brahma. Muslims from all over the world pay homage to this shrine. This shrine is actually the pedestal of Brahma. Notice that the word, Ibrahim is actually a corruption of the word, Brahma. The octogonal grill which is a Vedic design, protects the holy footprints which represent the start of the creation nearly 2000 million years ago.
Before it was captured by the Muslims it was an international shrine of the Vedic trinity. In fact the names of the holiest of Muslim cities Mecca and Medina come from the Sanskrit words Makha-Medini which means the land of Fire-Worship. Even the most ancient names of these 2 cities were Mahcorava- which came from Mahadeva (Lord Shiva) and Yathrabn - which came from Yatra-Sthan (place of pilgrimage).
Islam came into being about 1372 years ago. It is well known that over 7500 years ago, at the time of the Mahabharat War, Kurus ruled the world. The scions of that family administered the different regions.
Prophet Muhammed himself and his family were adherents of Vedic culture.
The Encyclopedia Islamia admits as much when it says: "Muhammed's grandfather and uncles were hereditary priests of the Kaba temple which housed 360 idols!"
According to Arab traditions, Muhammad is a title. We do not know what name his parents had given him. We do however know that the central object of worship which survives at the Kaba today is a Shivling. That was allowed to remain there because that was the faceless family deity of Muhammad's family. One of the original names of Lord Shiv is Mahadev (The Great God) therefore it is entirely possible Muhammad came from Mahadev. This appears fairly certain because the Arabs still have a Mahadevi sect. Moreover the title Mehdi of a Muslim chief is also a malpronounciation of the term Mahadeva. According to Sanskrit etymology the term Muhammad implies 'a person of great inspiration' - 'Mahan Madah yasya assau Muhammadah' In a hostile sense it also implies 'a person of a proud and haughty temperament'.
The Qurayshi tribe into which Mohammed was born was particularly devoted to Allah and and the three children of the Moon God. Therefore when Muhammad decided to spread his own Divine religion, he took innumerable aspects of the daily Vedic culture that surrounded him and applied them to suit the temperment of his era.
Regards
Badmash :)
2:26:43 AM
Posted By Badmash Shaitan Comments (7) Uncategorized
Comments
Badmash Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:50:13 AM
kisi ko 2 line ka reply dene main jor aata hain?
hello Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:08:11 PM
he he he!!!
he he he Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:08:21 PM
he he he he he
Infidel Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:04:46 PM
Great one, badmash. So now who is idolator?I pesonally liked the different meanings of muhammad. Good research, bro.
Badmash Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:54:48 PM
Thanks brother Infidel :) i did research whole night and found this really incredible artical.
kam ne kaj Thursday, February 22, 2007 6:27:16 PM
kam na kaj ke dushman anaj ke.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 23, 2007 6:26:10 AM
The point Badmash Shaitan is making, I believe, is that research can come up with anything. And since the results of one research may not be satisfactory to another researcher, no research is final. In fact, there is no finality to anything, except blind faith. The faithful does not question nor does he tolerate questions. But what is desirable is enlightened faith and not blind faith and enlightened faith is sustained on questioning and when the questioning ceases upon understanding, faith is no longer required - enlightenment occurs.

Badmash Friday, February 23, 2007 12:30:14 PM
Infidel and Venu thnaks for your humble replies :)But that cannot be false broken part of "Shivling" is set in mecca which was captured by muslim invader "Gori Gajnavi". Venu would you please enlight on this fect.
Blog_Inspector Friday, February 23, 2007 5:11:36 PM
You hit the bull's eye when you say that Sang-E-Aswad is nothing but representation of Shivling. We refer to Shiva as "Jyothirlingam". Ling itself is nothing but the usual oval shape that light generally takes as in a candle or deepak etc. God, the Supreme is therefore "light". Light is the vision many great founders of religion had before some point of knowledge or some human value system struck them as important and convincing. Muslims say "Allah" is formless. Sikhs say "Ek omkar niraakar". Thus Shiva is the one and only God and his form is that of a tiny point of light!
K.Venugopal Friday, February 23, 2007 10:22:12 PM
Dear Blog Inspector, The light spoken of in spiritual literature is not the light by which our physical eye sees. It is the light by which our spiritual 'eye' sees, whereby we get enlightened. However, such light is often depicted in a physical form, which is natural because our journey to the spiritual starts with our physical form.
K.Venugopal Friday, February 23, 2007 10:41:55 PM
Dear Badmash, That a piece of stone (called Aswad) is kept in the holiest of holy Islamic structures in their grandest mosque means that Muslims consider the stone special (and kiss it). In fact the only other stone that is part of the Hajj rites is the stone pillar (called Jamrah) that depicts Satan and which is in turned stoned! If Jamrah represents Satan, then Aswad could logically represent Allah. More research needed here, really. (Kissing and stoning are exact opposite activities - as opposite as Allah and Satan.)As you said, the Aswad (black stone) broke or cracked when a Muslim invader attacked Mecca about 200 years after Mohammad and lifted the stone back to his Kingdom in the North East of the Arabian peninsula. We have not heard about Hindus attacking others’ temples for lifting idols because anyone could carve out any number of idols to his hearts content in Hinduism. But in Islamdom they have only one idol and no further idols are permitted and hence the raid for it.Please continue with your research and post your findings regularly.

Blog_Inspector Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:41:53 PM
Dear Mr.Venugopal,Spirit means "soul". Soul needs a physical body and physical eye to see, since by itself soul does not experience anything. The "light" mentioned in scriptures is truly not "physical", I agree. It is "metaphysical" i.e. non-material.
Badmash Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:46:44 PM
Dear Venu Thanks for your reply. Venu bhai i said ki muslim invader "Gori Gajnavi" attacked on Indian Tample name "Kedarnath tample" now which is in nepal..theek!! Obviously he did not cracked Shivling to worship hindy idol...but to make inian kings down therefore he did.Islamic invaders ne Hindu kings ko insult karne ke liye kedarnath tample per attack kia and cracked Shivling to make Hindu ppls and kings down and then he wrapd piece of broken Shivling in thick chain aur usse apni country tak le kar gaya like symbol of his victory over hindu kings. and this is what i heard is fect non hindu kings could defeated gori gajnavi except hindu raja Prithviraj chuahan. isn't that true?
Badmash Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:51:48 PM
Blog inspector your rite there is only one God in form of light which is we heard from our elders. and hence we call them Shiva,etc. as Venu said ki God is mean to be in spiritual Light. not NDPL tata light hehehehehehe Thanks for your reply Blog Inspector
perfektm Saturday, February 24, 2007 2:01:33 PM
is there any respect for shivling in that kissing... or was it because you are indirectly touching your pedo prophet hands?
K.Venugopal Sunday, February 25, 2007 5:09:35 PM
Dear Blog Inspector, Spirit, Soul, Essence, Life, Consciousness - all mean the same. It is only a concept. The soul or spirit or essence or life or consciousness of everything is God. Creation is the expression of God. It is no different from God. Just as the waves are no different from the ocean. The One God becomes many expressions. We have to realize our essence and celebrate our expressions – this is the purpose of life.

Lives and Teachings of Ten Remarkable Spiritual Masters


Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Lives and Teachings of the Ten Remarkable Spiritual Masters

Divine Messengers of Our TimeSusunaga Weeraperuma.Sri Satguru Publications (Delhi), ISBN 81-7030-599-3166 pages
Price: Rs.250
Contents:
Preface. 1. Mahatma Gandhi: the man of God. 2. Yogaswami: the strange saint of Sri Lanka. 3. Sri Aurobindo: the saintly scholar who found God. 4. Ramana Maharshi: seek the self. 5. Swami Ramdas: his life and teachings. 6. Swami Sivananda: the saint of Rishikesh. 7. Paramahansa Yogananda: the Royal Road to self-realization. 8. Srila Prabhupada: praise Krishna. 9. Peace pilgrim's oneness with God. 10. Bishrul Hafi: servant of Allah. Glossary.
About the Book
The present book contains essays on the lives and teachings of the ten remarkable spiritual masters of our time.
Like the divinely inspired prophets in the past, these later day sages have also been showing us the superiority of the spiritual and eternal over the mundane and the transient. That the path of righteous leads to peace, happiness and salvation is part and parcel of their timeless message. The life and teachings of the following masters have been included in the book.
Mahatma Gandhi, Yogaswami, Sri Aurobindo, Ramana Maharshi, Swami Ramdas, Swami Sivananda, Paramahansa Yogananda, Srila Prabhupada, Peace Pilgrim, and Bishrul Hafi.
The book includes portraits of the masters and a glossary of the terms used in the book.
About the Author
Susunaga Weeraperuma is a Doctor of Letters who enjoys living in the quietness of the medieval Provencal village of Les Arcs-sur-Argens in France. Born in Sri Lanka where he was raised in the Buddhist religion, Weeraperuma has been spending the major part of his life in England, Australia, Switzerland and France. After taking a Master?s degree in Economics and Politics at London University, he qualified as a Librarian and thereafter became a senior member of staff in the British Library and the South Australian Parliamentary Library. It was during this period that he wrote several works on Library Science and compiled and extensive Krishnamurti bibliography. Following early retirement, Weeraperuma now devotes his time of contemplation, writing, yoga and gardening. The author of 18 published books including 2 collections of short stories, his works are mostly about religion and spiritual growth. Some of his important books are as followed: Major Religions of India, J. Krishnamurti as I Knew Him, Living and dying from Moment to Moment, That Pathless Land, Bliss of Reality, Homage to Yogaswami, Servant of God and The Higher Life.
For Copies contact at your nearest bookshop
or
Indian Books Centre40/5,Shakti Nagar,Delhi- 110007Ph No. 91-11-2384 4930 2384 6497Fax No.91-11-2384 7336E-mail ibc@indianbookscentre.comWebsite: http://www.indianbookscentre.com
Request a Complete Catalogue
1:39:15 PM
Posted By naresh gupta Comments (2) Society
Comments
Bhushan Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:02:26 PM
My best spiritual guru is Osho.Bcoz he use to talk about every known religion.Also at the same time he use to critise those religion.
K.Venugopal Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:08:12 PM
Osho was a self-realised man of amazing brilliance. We, mere mortals, ought not to make the mistake of comparing Gurus. Each teaches the truth in his or own unique way. We only need to pursue the Guru we are most comfortable with.