Disagreement and dialogue

Sunday, January 7, 2007

We May Disagree, Let Us Have A Dialogue
Palash Biswas
(Pl Publish and send a copy. I need Feedback. Contact: Palash Biswas, Gosto Kanan, Sodepur, Kolkata- 700110, India. Phone: 91-33-25659551.)
I am not irritated to read our respected friend Mohammad Abdullah`s reaction on my article, `A Phone Call and A Letter From London' webcasted by News From Bangladesh. Rather I am ashamed of myself that our friend compares me with a personality like Bapu. My friends as well as foes know well my stand on Gandhism and Sangh Pariwar. Whatever may be my opinion , the man who was not a general nor a head of the state or enjoyed any position in the establishment, is respected by the people worldwide. I may not have any wildest dream to dare experimenting with truth. I am sending this article to readership general as I sent the letter written by Sunil Pal. I hope, we would know many more facts to understand the destiny we bear.
I was stunned to hear and read Mr sunil Pal`s experience as I know nothing about this. We Bengali refugees have no such experience outside Bengal. I am not biased. Niether I supported Mr Pal`s claim. Mr Abdullah is right that I am a poor writer and have not as much as wealth as he possesses. I did not call Mr Pal. He called me. I am a keen student of history and I just posted the matter to wider readership to get feedback to understand the relevent facts. I am thankful that despite condemning me in a very rough manner, Abdullah Bhai gives some facts which I never knew. It is other part of the story which is never highlighted in India.
I am against minority persecution in Bangladesh as well as in India and anywhere in this world. I also condemn the role of caste Hindu leadership of Bengal who wanted to dislodge Muslims and dalits from power and they supported the partition, not the Muslim dominated East Bengal. What Shyama Prasad did, I don`t support. I understand the role of Jinnah and the role played by Gandhi. I am speaking about the role of the third party, the victims, the Hindu as well as Muslim underclasses. I welcome other opinions and facts however harsh may be. I am not contradicting Mr Pal or Mr Abdullah. Both of them describe the facts in accordance with their viewpoint. I am not communal and if I visit shonadanga, I would ensure that there communal harmony may sustain. I may play a role of a truth finder.
The people victimised could not tell their story. First person version of the partition story is still absent in Bengali and Indian History and Literature. It is not documented at all. Every bit of documentation is sponsered by the ruling classes in the subcontinent which do not reflect the suffreing of the masses.
As far as the language of the gentlman from USA equipped with far better English is concerned , I don`t mind. He abuses everyone. So what if he calls my late father a terrorist and an Indian Agent paid for anti Bangladeshi activities. The man who had been arrested for his participation in Bhasha Andolan, the mother of Bengali Nationality movement, against Pakistani regime, is termed as anti bangladesh. I have not to comment.As far as I am concerned , I never criticise aesthetic sense and opinions of any person.
Let me clear , My late father had a heart always bleeding for the land he had to leave due to the taragedy which is well described by our friend while he portrayed the other dimentions of the story. Well, Muslims as well as Hindus, most of them did not want partition were victimised by the ruling classes. He never disrespected either Pakistan or Bangladesh. Well, he never accepted the political border imposed upon divided Bangla Nationality. His lifelong struggle may sound meaningless to a non resident Bangladeshior NRI, but he supported his lot the underclasses deprived of civil and human rights. He led peasants` revolt. Hence, Abdullah bhai sees him as a terrorist. He may rewrite the history , welcom.
I want to inform, as a peasant leader, despite his commitment to the refugees he could not hate Muslims. He worked among the riot victims in Assam as earlier as in 1960 as a communist leader. The party was against any communist leader from outside to visit Assam. As PC Joshi , The General secretary of Communist party of India disowned Telengana as well as dhimri Block movements , he was disillusioned. After his Assam visit, he was ousted from the party. He visited the Muslim Victims in the riots of Meerut, Bijnore and Gonda and he also opposed sangh parivar and its fascist politics. Though Atal Bihari as a Jansangh President in 1969 assured him to raise the issues related to Bengali refugees from party forum. On atalji`s initiative, he joined Jansangh in 1969 and was invited in Mumbai National Convention where he was not allowed to speak for refugees. He immediately left the party and thereon, opposed Sangh Pariwar .For me, I respect the freedom and sovereignity of Bangladesh> I respect the committed intellegentia and media in bangldesh. I respect Bangla and Indian nationalities. I assume that I have the heritage rooted in this dual nationality. I also have respect for Pakistan and other free nations worldwide. I only emphasise that the global imperialism has made us sick and we suffer fro Demntia.
Let the informations flow independently. We may disagree and even oppose. The readers are adult enough to judge the facts. We have not to dictate. I only object that Abdullah Bhai is trying to tell editors not to publish anything which he thinks is against Bangladesh. I know, the editors in Bangladesh are better from those in any part of the world who know their job very well and may not be dictated.
I am not like some Indian and Bangladeshi writers who have commercialised anti Islam opinions and sensul sex activities.
Abdullah Bhai should recognise secular and democratic forces active in this subcontinent.
I am in favour of constant dialogue among differnt people of this subcontinent as they have no role in the artificial tention and wargame of ruling classes. In a new world, this subcontinent has to be united , I firmly believe. I am grateful that at least a section of Bangladeshi media including NFB and The Independent provides me the opportunity to address Bangladeshi audiance. I am used to write for little mags and I don`t write for entertainment. Niether I have been paid from anywhere. I am using Net as a democratic forum and have not got any renumeration from anywhere till this date.
Here is the article by Mohammad Abdullah:
News From bangladesh ISSN 1563-9304 Poush -342 1413 BS, Sunday January 07, 2007 Click here to print this article --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem Across the Border
Friday January 05 2007 12:01:49 PM BDT
Mohammad Abdullah, USA
Recently a self proclaimed Indian known profoundly as Mr. Palash Chandra Biswas is engaged in spreading venom of the communal agenda at NFB by writing features on the Hindu-Muslim issues. His utterances often reverberates Hindu-Muslim, Hindu-Muslim, ...... like a broken record of the mediocre communal king-making Hindu leader Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.
Thus, Mr. Biswas is playing the role of a pseudo Gandhi. Although this sounds very generous with respective to the Hindu communal perspective but I see similarities with the communal engineer Mr. Tathagatha Roy, as seen at NFB sometime ago.
Mr. Biswas noted his conversations presumably over phone with some naam-nehaat (so-called) character, Mr. Sunil Kumar Pal, from U.K. The account stunned the readers as the communal heat expanded in the light of the fake conversations. Per acclamation of Mr. Biswas it indicates that his father was a formal terrorist in India while leading peasants as he was arrested in 1958 by the Nehru Administration.
At a later date Bangladesh rightfully arrested this Indian terrorist as he engaged in destroying the integrity of Bangladesh by crossing the border illegally. Beyond doubt late Mr. Pulin Kumar Biswas seems to be a sophisticated Hindu dedicated to subversive activities in Bangladesh as a paid Indian agent.
What is the purpose of the presence of Mr. Palash Chandra Biswas in the pages of NFB? He loiters in the streets of the NFB pages freely and engaged in erecting communal agenda slowly but steadily. These free pages have been primarily established emphasizing the interest of Bangladesh and thereby Bangladeshis. Is Mr. Biswas a wanted person in these free pages? Is he a self invited person for these pages? The intelligent stupid Indians have not developed any such free pages for their people. Perhaps due to this reason Mr. Palash Biswas is loitering in the pages of NFB.
The attitude displayed through the write ups of Mr. Palash Chandra Biswas is detrimental concerning the interest of Bangladesh. He is tirelessly engaged in spreading the venom of communalism. His clear agenda is vitiated with Indian hegemony and dirty designs against Bangladesh.
The Bengali-speaking ignorent Indians residing within the territory of West Bengal realize that they are the second or third class citizens of communally democratic modern India. Thus, this cross-section of stupid Indians is looking for some avenues in the Bangladeshi arena in the name of BENGALITWA.
Nevertheless, the residents of West Bengal of India are nothing but the same ignorent Indians as the people of the other part of modern India. An Italian or a German or a French speaking SWISS is always regarded as a SWISS, not Italian or German or French. Similarly the Bengali speaking Indians are nothing but the Indians by all means as their allegiance is bounded by the administration centered in Delhi.
What is the REFUGEE MOVEMENT, Mr. Biswas? For what purpose his terrorist father had struggled life long? Let us examine categorically some of the issues that Mr. Biswas has addressed in the recent write up attributing to the letter of Mr. Sunil Kumar Pal.
In general, consistent observation tracks that a Hindu from West Bengal or other parts of modern India is a “giant miser” in making overseas phone calls. This means that without any specific purpose or straightened out agenda a Bengali speaking Hindu of India will not spend a single penny.
Invariably there is a solid purpose for the phone conversation of naam-nehat Mr. Sunil Kumar Pal with Mr. Palash Chandra Biswas. The underlying PURPOSE is to undermine or discredit Bangladesh and the people of Bangladesh in the global perspective.
In 1950 there were no widespread communal riots in East Pakistan. This is a propaganda orchestrated by the Nehru Administration. It was a pre-text of the removal of the Muslims from newly independent TAIL-CUT India. J. L. Nehru could not digest the defeat from M. A. Jinnah as the later ate the cream of the yogurt. Nehru forgot that he and Gandhi sent Jinnah to Pakistan. Unfortunately Gandhi realized his mistakes which he wanted to clean in the water of the River Yamuna.
Therefore, he launched a demand fore the legal share of about 55 Koti (550 Million) Rupees for Pakistan which Nehru blocked. Eventually Gandhi paid the price of his mistake by giving life to a ruthless fanatic Hindu fascinated by Sardar Patel through the meetings with Savarkar in Bombay days prior to the assassination. Due to the tail-cut size of Hindu dominated India Nehru could not take the humiliation. Therefore, he had to orchestrate communal riots under the secular umbrella of his imported democracy.
In this way Nehru’s India began the games with riots in several parts covering Punjab, Kashmir, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Assam, Bihar, Bengal, and several other Muslim majority places of Northern India.
Actually in 1950 there were unlimited riots all over modern India which began driving out the Muslims. To accomplish the agenda Nehru Administration overlooked the riots and ignored the appeal for peace or amnesty and clemency. The overall effort was undertaken by several leading Congress Party workers as well as supporting communal parties that killed Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Mr. Biswas or Mr. Pal seems to ignore the role of Nehru and Patel as if Indian Hindu leaders were absolutely saint and did not know about the riots on their soil.
Mr. Biswas and Mr. Pal seem to be articulate presenter of the 1950 days as if no one experience those days. Are the people of Bangladesh as the Hindu dominated Indians? Concerning illegal migration, India was the instrumental for this process.
It was Indian design to send infiltrators periodically to shake the foundation of Pakistan. Moreover, Aakash Baani orofey (a.k.a.) All India Radio got engaged in constant propaganda to destabilize newly formed Pakistan.
Their destabilization agenda was justified for Pakistan as the KIMVUTKIMAKAR DESH which separates two parts by about 1200 miles Indian Territory. Among the most active political worker cum leader was Shyma Prasad Mookerjee, scoundrel son of the self-styled Banglaar Baagh Ashutosh Mookerjee. The most active political vehicle that Shyma Prasad acquired was the communal BHARATIYA JANA SANGHA (BJS), the predecessor of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Nehru hated the party most but could not do anything because of his democratic platform in the agenda of the independent India.
BJS was formed by Shyma Prasad Mookerjee in October 1951. Prior to that he was associated with the Hindu Mahashava and became President circa 1944. In the post independence period he was absorbed by J. L. Nehru in the Interim Central Government as Minister for Industry and Supply. He had a virtual bout with Nehru in the cabinet meeting and eventually resigned in April 1950.
Soon after Bharatiya Jana Sangha was created Shyma Prasad was taken to the jail in Kashmir where he died in May 1953. This Shyma Prasad came to Dacca in 1945 and delivered a speech at the bank of the River Burhiganga. The location was near to the East Bengal High School adjacent to the modern Ferry Ghat is located. He noted there that all Bengali speaking Muslims MUST RETURN TO HINDUISM as soon as the BRITISH LEAVES THE SOIL as the Muslim population will be taken back within the Hindu community provided all becoming SCHEDULE CASTE. He continued threatening with killing or physical removal if not done so immediately after the departure of the British.
He further opted that each violating Muslim will be submerged in the River Burhiganga first and then in the Bay of Bengal. His public lecture as the Hindu Mahashava leader was not forgotten but triggered all troubles in the days to come. Now I am getting back to the letter of Mr. Pal.
During the infamous India supported communal riots of 1950, people along the border were very much furious with safety. They found the majority Hindu looters around them and eventually submitted their belongings to them. Mohammad Samiruddin still remembers as how he was looted with his entire family by Bhnoda Goala (or Vnoda Ghosh) gang of the border area, later becoming Indian Nadia. This kind of incident is not alone but occurred at a mass scale in all over India administered by Nehru.
Mr. Pal’s description is a singleton enlargement of the one-sided view as he forgot to mention about the affected Samiruddin type people. Of course this is the Hindu nature when they talk about the events of 1947 and post 1947 days.
Mr. Pal mentions that all the Hindus left for West Bengal. Essentially this occurred in 1946 and continued in the coming days and years. This happened following the Muslims of Bengal voting for Pakistan. The Hindus did not put option for staying back and/or fight for independent BENGAL which H. S. Suhrawardy and Sarat Bose orchestrated in 1946.
The upper caste Hindus expressed unhappiness staying together with the Bengali-speaking Muslims. They were not in favor of democratic platform of independent BENGAL. Under any circumstance the Hindus of Eastern Bengal were not willing to stay together with the Muslims of the same land. They were in favor of partition. Thus, they drummed up for leaving the ancestral houses for West Bengal.
At first they began settling toward the western side of the River Bhagirathi. This is because the rumor was that the border may take place through the River Bhagirathi, if Pakistan is materialized. Thus, the initial migrants became residents of Birbhum, Howrah, Hooghly, Medinipore, Bardhaman (Burdwan), Bankura, and several other places.
At a later time after 1947 when the border was ascertained then the Hindus decided to settle along 24 Parganas, Nadia, Murshidabad, Maldaha (Malda), West Dinajpur, and other places as migration continued regardless of any riot. The perception was presumed that RIOTS in East Pakistan took place regardless of the fact.
Thus, although there was no riot at all but the thinking process takes the Hindus to the scenario of WORLD’S LARGEST RIOTS. Essentially, the events were diametrically opposite that Mr. Pal narrated in the letter to Mr. Biswas. Misleading information and spreading lies or cooked stories were the vehicles of the extremists Hindus throughout the ages.
Thus, a concrete or fair history of modern India is not available by any Hindu writers. For example, the lawyer turning so-called historian Jadu Nath Sarker had vitiated the events dominated by the Muslims in India before the British stepped there. By the same token Bankim Chandra Chatterjee is not a novelist but a cooker of communalistic viewpoints as demonstrated in Anondo Motth.
A large number of people were killed in the Indian soil by the Hindu assassins or killers. Most recently they turned terrorists via killing of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. The communal terrorist Nathuram Godse was not alone but the entire communal Hindu world was after terrorism throughout India. The killings were largely done by the massive number of Hindus those who consistently enchanted Bondey Matorom before or after 1947. Any Hindu adherent does not admit this for truth.
Due to the widespread riots all over India Refugees began to arrive in various parts of Pakistan. These Refugees were from Central Indian Territories, Bihar, West Bengal, Assam, Punjab, Kashmir, Rajasthan, Gujrat, Maharashtra, Hyderabad (Deccan or modern Andhra), Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and so on. The Refugees of East Pakistan were mainly from West Bengal, Bihar, Assam, Orissa, Deccan, and some from Central India.
The mass scale migration of the Muslims to Pakistan was a severe havoc. The Pakistan Government could not control the distribution of these Refugees. Thus, they were dependent on begging and living in the streets and Government Buildings. In 1947, a bunch of Refugees took shelter under the open sky in the adjacent wall of the East Pakistan Secretariat at Topkhana Road. Similar patterns were at the Victoria Park (now Bahadur Shah Park) and adjoining schools. It took years to remove these floating Refugees as people helped each other.
Mr. Pal writes that there were no Muslims in Shondanga. The fact of the matter is that the district of India occupied Nadia had 40 % Muslims on the average but in many segregated places had over 60% Muslims. Likewise Murshidabad had exceeding 60% Muslims all over as an average rate. These Muslims were mostly landowners and had well to do economic conditions.
Hardly were they poor but the Refugees tortured them to be impoverished via lootings and persecution. Shondanga is near to the central part of Nadia where Muslims were living at all corners before 1947. These Muslims were driven out by the migrants like Mr. Pals when they left East Pakistan. Thus, Shondanga became devoid of Muslims, Mr. Pal.
How did you write that there were no MUSLIMS in SHONDANGA in 1950? Within the next moment you stated that all Muslims left by exchanging the land and properties with the Hindus. If there were no Muslims in Shondanga then how did you find Muslims to get land and property exchanged in Shondanga, Mr. Pal? Blatant lies must have some limit in the public arena.
The Muslims those who left homes never returned to the Hindu dominated India for so called land settlement. This BAQWAS (rubbish) statement must have some sense of proportion. Bunch of nonsensical logistics have been provided stating Hindu and Muslim laws. As the Hindus captured Muslim properties, then became default owner as the Muslims never returned to their homes. The Hindus settled in Shondanga and adjoining areas had some characteristics.
For example, they looked for FISHES all over the map almost overnight. They hunted various rivers, ponds, lakes, and other accumulated water sources to find fishes. Fishing was inherited by these Hindus and, thus, captured Muslim properties having ponds or tanks or houses adjacent to the rivers. The criminals in the name of Refugees used to attack Muslim houses in the neighborhood and began occupation forcibly. Often these criminal Refugees harassed local Muslims and did not spare the heritage who got converted to Islam during the days of Ikhtiyaruddin Mohammad Bakhtiyar Khilji circa 1204 A.D.
After 1950 many Hindus came back to East Pakistan and began living in their houses as they did not exchange or sell the properties. Thus, the Hindus often used to come back to the soil and remained for some time. They often cleared land property taxes (khazna – a tradition since the days of the Sultans and Kings).
In January 1964 there was a vibration due to the upheavals following the riots in Calcutta and other parts of India that began in November 1963. At that time the theft of the hair of the Islamic Prophet from the Hazratbaal Dargaah Masjid in Srinagar, Kashmir became a prominent issue which led to this riot. If this situation would have been clarified by the Nehru Administration in late October 1963 then there would have been no riot.
A number of Hindus stole the sacred HAIR OF THE ISLAMIC PROPHET from the Dargaah Masjid and never compromised to returning. Thus, flame was triggered in India first followed by some scattered incidences in East Pakistan. By January 8th 1964 the incidents were in control which flared up on January 4th in the same year; whereas in Calcutta, the communal flame was still continuing for over six weeks.
The first event started in Calcutta with a bearded Muslim being slaughtered openly in the afternoon by snatching him from the running tram at a stoppage. At that time Jana Sangha workers were chanting Bondey Matorom besides calling for bringing back 92 Lakh Hindus from East Pakistan to the safe Hindu dominated land – known as India.
As a coincidence the tram stopped at Park Circus and the bearded Muslim guy was about to leave the tram. Unfortunately he was caught right away by the Jana Sangha activists and immediately became a victim with the RAAM DAA. Immediately flame started all over the map and violated the streets of Dacca, more than a month later at the eve of the New Year. After the 1963-1964 riot Muslims felt very unsafe in India. A large cross section of people again left India for East Pakistan. The domicile certificate for these Muslims became a serious problem.
Let me narrate an incident of December 1963. Near Ichhapur in 24 Parganas there was an old man in seventies who stayed back in India with children. He lived on business in Calcutta and Howrah, and obviously a man of wealthy nature. He was attacked first for CHANDA – money for charity with no obvious valid reason. Then he was tied with a wood similar to that of crucifixion style and the Hindus began chopping off one after another part of the body. His right hand was chopped off in one bang. Then the cruel Hindus asked him which part be the next.
In the next moment they chopped off the other hand. Next they chopped off his legs. By then the old man already died on the erected wood. This was the nature of the Hindu devilish cruelty in those days. Yet the Hindus uttered over Aakash Baani about their secularism and democracy.
In October 1962 Sino-Indian clash started over the land piece in Kashmir. At that time the Muslims were the subject of victims. They were harassed at their houses calling them as Chinese spy leaving behind Pakistani spy. Many fascinated Muslims had AIR GUNS since the pre-1947 days. They were immediately harassed with the gun issue. Their guns were taken by order of the local police station head.
The Hindu gun owners had no such problem. Muslims submitted their guns per rules promulgated by the administrators. At a later date when the return date of these guns came then each gun was mysteriously found broken or damaged. This was the nature of the democratic secularism. Further during the Sino-Indian conflict Muslims were heavily charged for donation. This was a nice example of the Indian democracy. Mr. Pal could you find how many cases were there with the Krishnanagar Police?
Those Hindus left East Pakistan after 1964 began returning from time to time as Pakistan showed economic stability. During 1968 Pakistani currency showed strength to the maximum with a ratio of 1 Re Pakistani equal to 1.35 Re Indian. Thus, many Hindus got into the TAKA BODOL (currency exchange) business. These Hindus managed dual citizenship. They had hear and liver across the border while the stomach remained in East Pakistan.
After Bangladesh was established in 1971, Hindus began returning at a mass scale. Many employees of Indian organizations located in Bangladesh began demanding properties in their ancestral homes. Indian High Commission orofey Indian Embassy was backing them sitting at Road Number 2 in Dhanmondi, Dacca. These employees were working in the day times but keeping tracks of their ancestral homes by making trips and fueling terrorism. These fellows often threatened the Muslims and delivered Indian supremacy. Eventually many cases were sent to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. He did not pay attention to the Indian loyalists claiming landed properties in Bangladesh. Thus, Mujib never lifted ENEMY PROPERTY issue.
Ismael Sheikh or Ashraf Gaen is nothing but Indian citizen. They have no connection with Bangladesh or Pakistan. Suspicious Hindus think that a Muslim of Shondanga is a Bangladeshi or Pakistani citizen. Therefore, Mr. Pal did not hesitate to consider that the Muslims are non-Indians per his proclamation. Indeed any village in Nadia or Murshidabad or Maldaha or 24 Parganas or Bongaon areas (formerly belonged to Jessore but after 1947 became part of 24 Parganas) used to be like any village in Bangladesh. This is because these regions of West Bengal had large Muslim population.
In 1950 Shondanga Muslims fled away to save the lives but they were around there. Thus, they returned home as peace was prevailing. The Muslims in West Bengal were either Congress or Communist Party workers since 1947. This is nothing new and identical to the Hindus of Bangladesh belonging to Awami League.
In December 1992 communal activists uprooted Babri Masjid at the inspiration of the Congress Administration. The whole world saw the HOI MAATTOM of the OOUDVOT COMMUNAL HINDUS. Uprooting the 1528 built Masjid is a joke indeed concerning the birthplace of naam-nehat HINDU RAAM – the hero of the mythical narration of Balmiki, Ramayan. How the Hindus of 1992 ascertain that Hindu RAAM was born at that particular place?
Why the Hindus did not protest or say anything when Emperor Babar built this Masjid? The communal Hindus began communal venture with the demolition of this Masjid. The vibration got spread in Pakistan and Bangladesh but quickly brought into control.
In 1981 riot began at Ahmedabad following the throw of the piglets in the Eid prayer. All over India riots were taking place. THE TIMES OF INDIA published a cartoon starting in 1947 below the line till 1981 as how many riots took place in independent India. Above the line has the number of riots during British era that comprised 1946 only. Every disastrous event began with India concerning communal features and then followed as waves in the neighboring places. Instead of admitting this truth the Hindus of India always assert that the Muslims begin riots as if it is the Muslim profession. These Hindus never go to the root cause but jumps and bumps superficially.
It seems that late Nisith Pal was not a saint. He used to express communal motivation openly. That is why most likely his Hindu colleagues eliminated him physically to save the prestige of the Hindus. Indeed this is a nice act as Nathuram Godse finished Mohandas Gandhi. Unfortunately Mr. Sunil Kumar Pal misunderstands that Muslims killed his brother. This feeling is coming in his mind because his predecessors migrated to a new place which did not like. Thus, he is antagonistic to the Muslims for no good reason and still roams with falsehood.
Shondanga, Dhubulia, Rupdaha, Karimpur, Chaprha (Chapra), Harindanga, Bethuadohri, Polashy, Krishanagar, Belpukur, etc. never got exemption from riots. Muslims suffered there, yet they stayed back at their houses because they are Indians. Somehow Mr. Pal insists and focuses with bogus logic that these Muslims are foreigners either from Bangladesh or Pakistan which the Indian authority is unable to prove. That is why the political parties and relevant administrators are keeping quiet concerning their own Muslim citizens. If the Muslims had any fault then invariably Hindu administrators would not spare them, Mr. Pal.
The Muslims do not need to slaughter on Fridays. They can slaughter any day which does not have any religious bar. Muslims have stolen pregnant cow and then slaughtered is a total bully. This sounds like a Hindu stealing cow milk of a Muslim in a Bangladeshi village. Is this possible? Where were you when this happened? Why didn’t you file a case with the Hindu administrators in the police station? Also no public areas were captured to make the Mosque or Masjid. This is a cooked feature from Mr. Sunit Pal.
It is absolutely ridiculous that the Muslims persecute Hindus in India. Are you joking, Mr. Sunit Pal? This sounds like stealing cows from a thief’s yard. In other words, CHORER OPOR BAATPAARHI. A fake list of activities of the Muslims of Shondanga in the name of the political party activities seems to be a bunch of baloney making no sense for having all said so far by Mr. Pal. He continues that the Police was refrained from investigation by the Muslim mob. It sounds that the place is now filled with the Muslims.
Therefore, it appears that Shondanga today is an ideal place for becoming a part of Bangladesh. Like 13% Hindus of Bangladesh the Hindus of Shondanga or Dhubulia can live nicely in harmony with the Muslims of Bangladesh. Mr. Pal can initiate launching a movement for creating an enlarged map of the satellite territories of Bangladesh by taking the slices from the Indian Administration in Delhi so that the Indian map can be reduced significantly.
It is quite difficult to understand that the Muslims - Ekat Sheikh and Haru Sheikh are the loyalists to the Pal family while other Muslims are antagonistic to them. How come these two Muslim chaps did not belong to the political parties? Why so much exception? Is there any logical explanation, Mr. Sunit Pal? His nature of complaints is reflecting communally motivated features. He is indulged with communalism without question. Therefore, he sees every Muslim as the communal character and cow thief. For some unknown reasons Ekat and Haru remained the loyalists to the Pal family members. This world is a strange place with non-uniform mass distribution that Mr. Pal cannot justify.
I hope Mr. Pal’s visit to West Bengal and invitation to Mr. Biswas to Dhubulia would be a more of harmonious and non-communal in nature. I trust they would not initiate communal riots with the help of the Refugees and BJP or similar communal leaders. Communal harmony is essential in order to keep Indian democracy in full swing. Remember, Muslims will have to swallow beef or cow while Hindus will have to search fishes for all time better democracy. As Hindus honor eating Pigs to the Western visitors or swallow Turtles then the Indian Muslims must be allowed to execute their needs for eating.
Although I posed questions to Mr. Sunil Pal but I expect both Mr. Palash Biswas and Mr. Sunil Pal must ponder to find legitimate answer to my questions. Further I ask them to refrain from the Bangladeshi websites. They need to find avenues that are colored with Indian designs. They must not vitiate Bangladeshi readership and audience. In future if I see write ups of the types they provided then they have to receive more harsh remarks and mercy less comments for their misdeeds and misjudgments of the situation.
I sincerely ask them to provide a balance write up reflecting non-communal environment if they want to exis
9:59:11 PM
Posted By palashchandra biswas Comments (1) Lifestyle
Comments
K.Venugopal Sunday, January 7, 2007 10:15:08 PM
Dear Mr. Palash Chandra Biswas, Your writings are posted in NDTV blogs. You write in detail and lengthily on every subject you take up. I must confess that I've not read many of your writings in full, due to their length. The length is not a demerit. The fault is mine due to paucity of time on the PC. However, I save your writings for future reads.I must commend you for your profound insight and dedication. Keep up the writings. You will eventually get your message across.